The Federal Trade Commission, launched in March 1915, was created in response to a groundswell of public concern that followed separate U.S. Supreme Court antitrust rulings against Standard Oil and American Tobacco in 1911.
The years straddling the turn of the 20th century were boom times for American big business. Money gushed, monopolistic companies grew huge and the rich prospered as never before. But there were also many losers — workers who couldn’t get ahead and small businesses unable to compete against the giants. Confronted with growing sense that capitalism was rigged, Congress passed laws to bridle the monopolies and thwart anti-competitive practices.
Two laws, the Sherman Antitrust and the Clayton Antitrust Acts, of 1890 and 1914 respectively, aimed directly at the problem, imposing restrictions on cartels and monopolies and regulating anti-competitive business practices. But Congress didn’t stop there.
Trust-busting was a major theme of the 1912 presidential election, and most political platforms that year favored the establishment of a trade commission. In 1914, Congress passed the Federal Trade Commission Act, creating an agency to enforce the new statutes and protect consumers from unfair business practices.
The FTC assumed the duties of its less powerful predecessor, the federal Bureau of Corporations. The act expanded the bureau’s authority to investigate and publish reports, giving the agency the power to bring administrative cases that challenged unfair competitive practices. In addition to enforcing antitrust provisions of the Sherman Act, the FTC uses Clayton Act powers to prohibit certain price discriminations, vertical business arrangements, interlocking directorships and stock acquisitions.
Over the decades, court decisions further defined the FTC’s legal authority, and Congress responded with legislation. While many issues centered on corporation competition and deceptive trade practices, other duties were added to the FTC roster. Changes including the Celler-Kefauver Act in the 1950s gave the FTC a role in approving corporate mergers. It also issued a rule on requiring health warnings on cigarette packaging in the early 1970s.
More recently, the FTC has taken on other duties, including enforcement of credit laws, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. It also operates to prevent consumer fraud. The 1994 Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud Prevention Act, for instance, gave it the authority to create the National Do Not Call Registry — a step to control uninvited and fraudulent telemarketing.
The FTC is headed by five commissioners and split up into offices including the Bureau of Consumer Protection and the Bureau of Competition. Its 13 offices, which cover everything from policy planning to international affairs, act in concert with one another.
Part of the FTC Act bans unfair business practices, those that cause substantial and unavoidable injury to the consumer.
In determining whether a practice is unfair, the FTC considers a set of criteria established in the Supreme Court’s 1972 Sperry and Hutchinson ruling. Although these criteria help the FTC make decisions, they allow discretion in enforcement.
The FTC can prevent a company from acting deceptively, which is another “no-no” under the FTC Act. These criteria are slightly more rigid. Although the criteria still leave room for interpretation, deceptive practices must fit all three benchmarks.
The FTC Act works in conjunction with numerous laws related to consumer financial protection. Because of the act’s close connections with other laws, the FTC oversees and helps enforce laws related to the FTC Act.
The Federal Trade Commission has several bureaus underneath it that help maintain these laws.
This bureau protects the consumers from unfair, deceptive or fraudulent trade practices. Attorneys enforce federal laws and FTC rules. The bureau also conducts investigations related to advertising and marketing, financial products, telemarketing, privacy and identity protection and other consumer issues. It also engages in rulemaking and consumer and business education.
This bureau attempts to prevent anti-competitive mergers and business practices.
This bureau helps the FTC evaluate the economic impact of its actions. Provides economic analysis of government regulation on competition and consumers, and critiques antitrust, consumer protection and regulatory plans.
The FTC investigates issues reported by individuals and businesses, reviews business pre-merger notification filings, and studies results from Congressional inquiries and media reports. It might look for false advertising claims or instances of fraud that involve a single business or entire industry. If the investigation uncovers unlawful conduct, the FTC can seek compliance through a consent order, or file an administrative complaint. Litigation is also possible.
Administrative complaints are heard in front of an independent administrative law judge, with the FTC serving as prosecutor. The FTC can also bring cases to the federal courts, which can impose fines, appoint receivers and monitors, and freeze business assets when deemed necessary. The FTC also promulgates and enforces trade rules, which regulate business practices.
In addition to other duties, the FTC enforces the Sherman Antitrust and Clayton Acts. Each law addresses commercial excesses that were common early in the 20th Century and are recurrent trouble spots.
In another famous case, the FTC prevailed in an antitrust suit against the phone-company giant AT&T in 1984. The Supreme Court ordered that the company be broken into seven regional operating units — known as Baby Bells — and restricted AT&T to selling long-distance service. Since then, some of the Baby Bells have merged again — moves allowed as technology (e.g. the invention of the Internet and cell phones) altered the telecommunication industry’s dynamics.
In 1999, the FTC took on Microsoft Corp., the world’s largest software manufacturer, asserting that the company’s attempt to include a Web browser in the computer operating system Windows would give it a monopoly in the personal computing arena. A federal court agreed with the FTC, ordering a breakup, but an appellate court overturned the ruling in 2001.
The FTC relies on Sherman Antitrust and Clayton Acts and a series of subsequent antitrust laws to protect society from businesses that abuse their standing. Among its missions is prevention of fraud and anti-competitive actions.
If a company violates either the Sherman Antitrust Act or the Clayton Act, it can be held liable under the more expansive Federal Trade Commission Act.
All the minor and specific stipulations of the Federal Trade Commission Act complement each other for the sake of the consumer. Together, they represent cohesive legislation aimed at keeping prices fair, protecting consumer privacy and prohibiting unfair business practices.